Posts Tagged ‘Crime’

A Life of Crime!

Written by Paula. Posted in Black Belt Research Project 2013

Black Belt Grading Project 2013 – Paula Clarke

Crime

The following is a questionnaire that was sent to a former Police Chief of Basingstoke who lived and worked in Basingstoke and Hampshire Constabulary from 1974 onwards.

The aim of it was to gain an insider’s knowledge (albeit a historical one) of crime in and around Basingstoke and hopefully to get an idea of how the police view the way we as individuals deal with self defence issues and whether the police see it as a vital skill for all to have or an annoyance that hinders their efforts.

I have to say that it didn’t really go to plan……………

To follow this you will find my questions in black type and the response I received in blacktype, because I didn’t necessarily receive the kind of information I wanted, I have then added my own conclusion in red to the end of the questionnaire.

 

Questions on Crime in Basingstoke

 

Would you consider Basingstoke a safe place to live?

Yes – Generally

Which parts of Basingstoke are safer? Does it follow that the more affluent areas are safer?

If you mean less crime – yes

 

How safe do you consider Basingstoke in relation to other nearby towns such as Southampton or Farnborough?

Probably safer but they have very different problems

 

Would you say there is a north / south divide when it comes to crime and which is worse?

Different types of crime – impossible to answer

 

What would you say given your years on the force are the most common crimes in Basingstoke?

Property crime

 

Who would you consider to be the most at risk group in Basingstoke for crimes to be committed against? Men, women, teenagers (boys or girls) O.A.P’s?

If you mean personal physical crime then young men

 

Why does this particular group face the most risk?

Combination of “macho” behaviour and drink

 

What are the most common crimes / HAOV (habitual acts of violence) committed against;

Men – Assault

Women  – Assault

Teenagers – Assault

OAPS –  Minimal with the odd exception

Not much of a sexual nature often in a domestic situation

 In terms of self-defence would the police consider a little knowledge a dangerous thing or do you think all women should possess some basic self-defence skills

It’s a Personal view, some basic skills

When interviewing victims of crime (particularly women) was there ever a common link between their self-preservation in the moment of the crime and their healing process i.e if the victim fought back, even if they eventually were overcome, did this aid in their healing process

No Idea ! only they can say 

Or was giving in preferable? (i.e was the ordeal over quicker therefore quicker to recover ?)

As Above

Is there anything over the years that you have seen work successfully in terms of self defence and does it work repeatedly?

No answer

 From your years on the force is there any invaluable tips/advice you could give to women to ensure their safety i.e, Plan Trips, Inform people of their whereabouts, Always go out in pairs etc

This is common sense especially not walking home alone late at night after drinking / clubbing

Where are women more likely to be attacked? at home ? Out in the open?

At home in domestic situation (violent partner)

Roughly what proportion of crime reported is solved / concluded

Too vague – obviously at home a high proportion

 

Is it a myth that you face more danger at night?

No – (outside the home)

Can you give me some information regarding your time on the force, i.e

Number of years’ service           32 ½ years  

Ranks held                                all ranks up to and including Supt.

A general overview of the types of crimes you faced daily

How the police view the perpetrators of these crimes / and the victims                                         Too Vague

Any other information you feel relevant

I retired nearly 20 years ago and can only comment on my experience then – times have definitely changed especially with the licensing laws and their effect, I cannot in fairness make assumptions about the present day, Basingstoke has changed!

It is not easy to compare Basingstoke with any other town as here are so many variables, i) type of population, race, age, students, unemployed. ii) Number of licensed premises and late night venues iii) types of accommodation, private, local authority, bed sit etc. iv) drug and vice problems.

 

 

Having received the written response to my questionnaire I had to sit and think what I felt about the vagueness of all the answers and the lack of any real detail, most of the answers we could of guessed at without any ‘special’ help.  I think the real answer to why it is so vague is perhaps because that is typical of policing back then, a time when it was very ‘closed shop’ information was on a need to know basis only and dare I say it a lot of information was not in the public’s interest and maybe a bit hush hush. It’s a very different affair to today with most things declared and available for public knowledge.

 

Which is the better way to live? Would we still want to live in a society policed that way? No, otherwise things would not have moved on, but do you feel safer knowing there were 450 burglaries in your area or with someone telling you “It’s not too bad round here mate”.

 

Knowledge is Power?

Blissful ignorance?

 

Maybe there is something to be said for both……………………. 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plus

The Internet Bully! (Self Defence 101)

Written by bryan. Posted in Self Defence

Cyber Bullying, Self Defence Basingstoke, Hampshire Self Protection, Hampshire Self Defence, Law, Internet Crime, Harassment, In  today’s society most of us have a real reliance on the Internet in it’s various guises. Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram, Linkedin, MySpace et al are here to stay, maybe not in their current forms because they’ll morph and merge over time. With the explosion in good quality internet connection from our Mobile phones, more and more of us are online.

I know they’ve got a vested interest, but Google’s Senior Vice President recently predicted that 50% of all adverts will be online in five years time, guess where their R&D investment will be going. Big players like Google, Facebook and our own mobile phone providers will continue to drive both traffic and our habits.

In most cases people use the internet appropriately to swap gossip, make plans for the weekend, discuss outfits or talk about their favourite sports teams. However there is a dark side, when the technology is abused, or used to harass or threaten others, there can be consequences legally that the perpetrator can face.

In late December 2012 both The Times and The Daily Mail carried stories talking about the massive increase in Internet crime.

  • 5,000 reported cases to 29 Police forces on Facebook or Twitter (556 in 2008, 4909 in 2011)
  • 650 people charged with offences
  • High profile crimes raised awareness in the media, included claims made about Tom Daley’s (the Diver) dead Father and comments about missing children such as Madeleine McCann, which resulted in a 12 week jail sentence.

There are four UK statute laws that are relevant to the use of IT in relation to bullying.  These are:

How these Acts can be related to bullying, and specifically to cyberbullying, is outlined below. If the bullying is based on sexual, racial or religious grounds, prosecution could be sought through anti-discriminatory laws. See the case of footballer Stan Collymore, who was racially abused on Twitter and the instigator was arrested by the Police

 

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

This Act was passed following concerns that stalking was not dealt with effectively under the existing legislation.  The Act does not refer solely to stalking but also covers harassment in a wider sense.  The Act states that it is unlawful to cause harassment, alarm or distress by a course of conduct and states that:-

A person must not pursue a course of conduct, which:

    • Equates to harassment of another person
    • They know or should to know, amounts to harassment of another person.

There is some anecdotal evidence that the police are more comfortable in bringing forward this law when dealing with issues of Cyberbullying. The police have successfully used the Protection from Harassment Act to prosecute for the sending of offensive e-mails through the internet.  Such messages (as well as Text messages) will also constitute an offence under the Malicious Communications Act. Facebook was in 2012 forced by the courts to reveal personal details of people who had harassed a woman.

 

Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

This Act defines a criminal offence of intentional harassment, which covers all forms, including sexual harassment.  A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he/she

  • uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour; or
  • displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress.

 

Malicious Communications Act 1998/Telecommunications Act 1984

Under this Act it is an offence to send an indecent, offensive or threatening letter, electronic communication or other article to another person.  Under section 43 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 it is a similar offence to send a telephone message which is indecent, offensive or threatening.

Both these offences are punishable with up to six months imprisonment and/or a fine.
The Malicious Communications offences are wider ranging, but under the Telecommunications offences, it is likely that the Police will use the former Act to bring a charge.

 

The Communications Act 2003

The Communications Act 2003 is by far the most recent Act to be passed.  Section 127 states that a person is guilty of an offence if he/she

text bullying, sms bullying, internet bullying, self defence in Basingstoke. self protection in basingstoke, the law and self defence

  • (1) A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or

(b) causes any such message or matter to be so sent.

  • (2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—

(a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,

(b) causes such a message to be sent; or

(c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.

  • (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both

People                                                                                                          

 4,500 young people talked to ChildLine about online bullying last year.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plus
Martial Arts Standards Agency British Judo British Council for Chinese Martial Arts – National Governing Body The World Union of Karate Federations Shi Kon Martial Arts British Council for Chinese Martial Arts – National Governing Body Safeguarding

Contact Us

Telephone (01256) 364104.

Email: info@basingstokekarate.com.

Shin Gi Tai Martial Arts Academy,
The Annex @ ITT Industries,
Jays Close,
Basingstoke,
RG22 4BA